Physics – Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
2003-07-25
pp. 277--292 in: M. Sch"urmann and U. Franz (eds.), Quantum Probability and Infinite Dimensional Analysis: from Foundations to
Physics
Quantum Physics
Revision 28-7-03: added reference Final revision 28-05-04. To appear in proceedings of "Quantum Probability and Infinite Dimen
Scientific paper
We analyse an argument of Deutsch, which purports to show that the deterministic part of classical quantum theory together with deterministic axioms of classical decision theory, together imply that a rational decision maker behaves as if the probabilistic part of quantum theory (Born's law) is true. We uncover two missing assumptions in the argument, and show that the argument also works for an instrumentalist who is prepared to accept that the outcome of a quantum measurement is random in the frequentist sense: Born's law is a consequence of functional and unitary invariance principles belonging to the deterministic part of quantum mechanics. Unfortunately, it turns out that after the necessary corrections we have done no more than give an easier proof of Gleason's theorem under stronger assumptions. However, for some special cases the proof method gives positive results while using different assumptions to Gleason. This leads to the conjecture that the proof could be improved to give the same conclusion as Gleason under unitary invariance together with a much weaker functional invariance condition.
No associations
LandOfFree
On an Argument of David Deutsch does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with On an Argument of David Deutsch, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On an Argument of David Deutsch will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-445533