Reply to Hagen & Sudarshan's Comment

Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Theory

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

one page, UMN-TH-1245/94

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1033

We show that the argument in Phys Rev Lett 70 (1993) 1360 is correct and
consistent, and that Hagen & Sudarshan's solution has inconsistency leading to
non-vanishing commutators of $[P^1, P^2]$ and $[P^j, H]$ even in physical
states. This proves that many of HS's statements in their Comment are based
merely on incorrect guess, but not on careful algebra.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Reply to Hagen & Sudarshan's Comment does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Reply to Hagen & Sudarshan's Comment, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply to Hagen & Sudarshan's Comment will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-426495

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.