Reply to Comment on "Quantum inversion of cold atoms in a microcavity: spatial dependence"

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

4 Pages

Scientific paper

10.1088/0953-4075/37/8/N01

The question raised by [Bastin and Martin 2003 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 36, 4201] is examined and used to explain in more detail a key point of our calculations. They have sought to rebut criticisms raised by us of certain techniques used in the calculation of the off-resonance case. It is also explained why this result is not a problem for the off-resonance case, but, on the contrary, opens the door to a general situation. Their comment is based on a blatant misunderstanding of our proposal and as such is simply wrong.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Reply to Comment on "Quantum inversion of cold atoms in a microcavity: spatial dependence" does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Reply to Comment on "Quantum inversion of cold atoms in a microcavity: spatial dependence", we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply to Comment on "Quantum inversion of cold atoms in a microcavity: spatial dependence" will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-421359

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.