Quasar Radio Dichotomy: Two Peaks, or not Two Peaks, that is the Question

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

to be published in the Proceedings of "AGN Physics with the SDSS"

Scientific paper

Recent claims by Ivezic et al. (2002) that the distribution of the radio-to-optical flux ratio, R, for quasars is bimodal (the so-called quasar radio dichotomy) were questioned on statistical grounds by Cirasuolo et al. (2003). We apply the approach suggested by Cirasuolo et al. to a sample of \~10,000 objects detected by SDSS and FIRST, and find support for the quasar radio dichotomy. The discrepancy between the claims by Cirasuolo et al. and the results presented here is most likely because 1) the ~100 times larger sample based on two homogeneous surveys that is used here allows a direct determination of the R distribution, rather than relying on indirect inferences based on Monte Carlo simulations of several heterogeneous surveys 2) the accurate SDSS colors and redshift information allow robust determination of the K-correction for R, which, if unaccounted for, introduces significant scatter that masks the intrinsic properties of the quasar R distribution.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Quasar Radio Dichotomy: Two Peaks, or not Two Peaks, that is the Question does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Quasar Radio Dichotomy: Two Peaks, or not Two Peaks, that is the Question, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Quasar Radio Dichotomy: Two Peaks, or not Two Peaks, that is the Question will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-420753

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.