Frequentist and Bayesian Confidence Intervals

Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Experiment

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

64 pages, 26 figures

Scientific paper

Frequentist (classical) and the Bayesian approaches to the construction of confidence limits are compared. Various examples which illustrate specific problems are presented. The Likelihood Principle and the Stopping Rule Paradox are discussed. The performance of the different methods is investigated relative to the properties coherence, precision, bias, universality, simplicity. A proposal on how to define error limits in various cases are derived from the comparison. They are based on the likelihood function only and follow in most cases the general practice in high energy physics. Classical methods are not recommended because they violate the Likelihood Principle, they can produce physically inconsistent results, suffer from lack of precision and generality. Also the extreme Bayesian approach with arbitrary choice of the prior probability density or priors deduced from scaling laws is rejected.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Frequentist and Bayesian Confidence Intervals does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Frequentist and Bayesian Confidence Intervals, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Frequentist and Bayesian Confidence Intervals will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-406145

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.