Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Experiment
Scientific paper
2001-06-05
Eur.Phys.J.direct C4 (2002) 12
Physics
High Energy Physics
High Energy Physics - Experiment
64 pages, 26 figures
Scientific paper
Frequentist (classical) and the Bayesian approaches to the construction of confidence limits are compared. Various examples which illustrate specific problems are presented. The Likelihood Principle and the Stopping Rule Paradox are discussed. The performance of the different methods is investigated relative to the properties coherence, precision, bias, universality, simplicity. A proposal on how to define error limits in various cases are derived from the comparison. They are based on the likelihood function only and follow in most cases the general practice in high energy physics. Classical methods are not recommended because they violate the Likelihood Principle, they can produce physically inconsistent results, suffer from lack of precision and generality. Also the extreme Bayesian approach with arbitrary choice of the prior probability density or priors deduced from scaling laws is rejected.
No associations
LandOfFree
Frequentist and Bayesian Confidence Intervals does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Frequentist and Bayesian Confidence Intervals, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Frequentist and Bayesian Confidence Intervals will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-406145