Physics – Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
2002-06-18
Phys. Rev. A 66, 062111 (2002)
Physics
Quantum Physics
REVTEX 4, 19 pages, 1 postscript figure
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevA.66.062111
Suppose N parties describe the state of a quantum system by N possibly different density operators. These N state assignments represent the beliefs of the parties about the system. We examine conditions for determining whether the N state assignments are compatible. We distinguish two kinds of procedures for assessing compatibility, the first based on the compatibility of the prior beliefs on which the N state assignments are based and the second based on the compatibility of predictive measurement probabilities they define. The first procedure leads to a compatibility criterion proposed by Brun, Finkelstein, and Mermin [BFM, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032315 (2002)]. The second procedure leads to a hierarchy of measurement-based compatibility criteria which is fundamentally different from the corresponding classical situation. Quantum mechanically none of the measurement-based compatibility criteria is equivalent to the BFM criterion.
Caves Carlton M.
Fuchs Christopher A.
Schack Ruediger
No associations
LandOfFree
Conditions for compatibility of quantum state assignments does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Conditions for compatibility of quantum state assignments, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Conditions for compatibility of quantum state assignments will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-366824