Common misrepresentation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

LaTeX, 10 pages, no figures

Scientific paper

A frequently given version of the argument of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen
against the completeness of the quantum mechanical description is criticized as
a misrepresentation that lacks the cogency of the original EPR argument.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Common misrepresentation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Common misrepresentation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Common misrepresentation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-362542

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.