No-Lose `Theorem' for Parity Violating Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering Experiments

Physics – Nuclear Physics – Nuclear Theory

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

8 pages, LaTeX, Los Alamos preprint LA-UR-93-1532

Scientific paper

A purely left-chiral model of the weak interactions is used to show that the total parity-violating asymmetry in quark-quark scattering must grow with increasing energy. In the absence of other new physics, non-observation of a large asymmetry can therefore be used to infer an upper bound on the mass scale for new right-chiral weak vector bosons. Applying this idea to actual nucleon-nucleon scattering requires more involved calculations, as the dominant contribution appears to come from a component of diquark-quark scattering related to, but not identical to, wavefunction-mixing. Earlier criticism of this model by Simonius and Unger is refuted and a new calculation is proposed as an additional check on the result. Finally, we argue that the so-called `spin crisis' does not affect our conclusions. (Talk given at the BNL workshop on future directions in particle and nuclear physics at multi-GeV hadron beam facilities, March 4--6, 1993.)

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

No-Lose `Theorem' for Parity Violating Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering Experiments does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with No-Lose `Theorem' for Parity Violating Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering Experiments, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and No-Lose `Theorem' for Parity Violating Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering Experiments will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-356107

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.