Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Scientific paper
2012-03-02
Physics
High Energy Physics
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
23 pages, 46 figures
Scientific paper
We provide a comparative study of the fine tuning amount (Delta) at the two-loop leading log level in supersymmetric models commonly used in SUSY searches at the LHC. These are the constrained MSSM (CMSSM), non-universal Higgs masses models (NUHM1, NUHM2), non-universal gaugino masses model (NUGM) and GUT related gaugino masses models (NUGMd). Two definitions of the fine tuning are used, the first (Delta_{max}) measures maximal fine-tuning wrt individual parameters while the second (Delta_q) adds their contribution in "quadrature". As a direct result of two theoretical constraints (the EW minimum conditions), fine tuning emerges as a suppressing factor (effective prior) of the averaged likelihood (under the priors), under the integral of the global probability of measuring the data (evidence p(D)). For each model, there is little or no difference between Delta_q, Delta_{max} in the region allowed by the data, with similar behaviour as functions of the Higgs, gluino, stop mass or SUSY scale (m_{susy}=(m_{\tilde t_1} m_{\tilde t_2})^{1/2}) or dark matter and g-2 constraints. The analysis has the advantage that by replacing any of these mass scales or constraints by their latest bounds one easily infers for each model the value of Delta_q, Delta_{max} or vice versa. For all models, minimal fine tuning is achieved for M_{higgs} near 115 GeV with a Delta_q\approx Delta_{max}\approx 10 to 100 depending on the model, and in the CMSSM this is actually a global minimum. Due to a strong ($\approx$ exponential) dependence of Delta on M_{higgs}, for a Higgs mass near 125 GeV, the above values of Delta_q\approx Delta_{max} increase to between 500 and 1000. Possible corrections to these values are briefly discussed.
Ghilencea Dumitru M.
Lee Michael H.
Park Miok
No associations
LandOfFree
Tuning supersymmetric models at the LHC: A comparative analysis at two-loop level does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Tuning supersymmetric models at the LHC: A comparative analysis at two-loop level, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Tuning supersymmetric models at the LHC: A comparative analysis at two-loop level will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-344503