Why Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen did not prove that quantum mechanics is `incomplete'

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

11 pages. Improved and extended version of quant-ph/0702018

Scientific paper

It is shown that the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen conclusion concerning the `incompleteness' of Quantum Mechanics is invalidated by two logical errors in their argument. If it were possible to perform the proposed gedanken experiment it would, in fact, show that Quantum Mechanics is `complete' for the observables discussed. Because, however, of the non square-integrable nature of the wave function, the proposed experiment gives vanishing probabilities for measurements performed in finite intervals of configuration or momentum space. Hence no conclusion as to the `completeness', or otherwise, of Quantum Mechanics can be drawn from the experiment.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Why Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen did not prove that quantum mechanics is `incomplete' does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Why Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen did not prove that quantum mechanics is `incomplete', we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Why Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen did not prove that quantum mechanics is `incomplete' will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-341158

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.