Physics – Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
2006-11-21
Physics
Quantum Physics
Revised version according to referee's comments. To appear in Physical Review A
Scientific paper
The equivalence of stabilizer states under local transformations is of fundamental interest in understanding properties and uses of entanglement. Two stabilizer states are equivalent under the usual stochastic local operations and classical communication criterion if and only if they are equivalent under local unitary (LU) operations. More surprisingly, under certain conditions, two LU equivalent stabilizer states are also equivalent under local Clifford (LC) operations, as was shown by Van den Nest et al. [Phys. Rev. \textbf{A71}, 062323]. Here, we broaden the class of stabilizer states for which LU equivalence implies LC equivalence ($LU\Leftrightarrow LC$) to include all stabilizer states represented by graphs with neither cycles of length 3 nor 4. To compare our result with Van den Nest et al.'s, we show that any stabilizer state of distance $\delta=2$ is beyond their criterion. We then further prove that $LU\Leftrightarrow LC$ holds for a more general class of stabilizer states of $\delta=2$. We also explicitly construct graphs representing $\delta>2$ stabilizer states which are beyond their criterion: we identify all 58 graphs with up to 11 vertices and construct graphs with $2^m-1$ ($m\geq 4$) vertices using quantum error correcting codes which have non-Clifford transversal gates.
Chuang Isaac L.
Chung Hyeyoun
Cross Andrew W.
Zeng Bei
No associations
LandOfFree
Local unitary versus local Clifford equivalence of stabilizer and graph states does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Local unitary versus local Clifford equivalence of stabilizer and graph states, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Local unitary versus local Clifford equivalence of stabilizer and graph states will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-339095