Physics – Nuclear Physics – Nuclear Theory
Scientific paper
1993-11-09
Phys.Rev.C49:3342-3345,1994
Physics
Nuclear Physics
Nuclear Theory
12 text pages and 1 figure (Figure available upon request), University of Arizona Physics Preprint (Number not yet assigned)
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevC.49.3342
Two ``phase-shift equivalent'' local NN potentials with different parametrizations, Reid93 and NijmII, which were found to give nearly identical results for the triton by Friar et al, are shown to yield remarkably similar results for 6Li and 14N in a (0+2)hw no-core space shell-model calculation. The results are compared with those for the widely used Hamada-Johnson hard-core and the original Reid soft-core potentials, which have larger deuteron D-state percentages. The strong correlation between the tensor strength and the nuclear binding energy is confirmed. However, many nuclear-structure properties seem to be rather insensitive to the details of the NN potential and, therefore, cannot be used to test various NN potentials. (Submitted to Phys. Rev. C on Nov. 9, 1993 as a Brief Report.)
Barrett Bruce R.
Zheng Dao-Chen
No associations
LandOfFree
Nuclear shell-model calculations for 6Li and 14N with different NN potentials does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Nuclear shell-model calculations for 6Li and 14N with different NN potentials, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Nuclear shell-model calculations for 6Li and 14N with different NN potentials will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-337240