Response: Comment on "Energy Transfer and Dual Cascade in Kinetic Magnetized Plasma Turbulence"

Physics – Plasma Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

We respond to the recent comment [arXiv:1105.1593] on our Letter [G. G. Plunk and T. Tatsuno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 165003 (2011)]. The comment claims that our argument for spectral transfer direction is incomplete. The comment gives an incomplete account of our argument. We explain how the argument of our Letter, in full, is self-contained consistent and well-supported by numerical evidence. Other technical statements made in the comment are explained to be incorrect. We direct interested readers to our forthcoming article, which should clarify any remaining technical ambiguities and also illuminate deeper physical issues.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Response: Comment on "Energy Transfer and Dual Cascade in Kinetic Magnetized Plasma Turbulence" does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Response: Comment on "Energy Transfer and Dual Cascade in Kinetic Magnetized Plasma Turbulence", we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Response: Comment on "Energy Transfer and Dual Cascade in Kinetic Magnetized Plasma Turbulence" will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-307883

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.