Timing, ``Accidentals'' and Other Artifacts in EPR Experiments

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

5 pages, LaTeX, 3 Encapsulated PostScript figures. Submitted to Physical Review Letters, November 1997. Minor corrections, pag

Scientific paper

Subtraction of ``accidentals'' in Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiments frequently changes results compatible with local realism into ones that appear to demonstrate non-locality. The validity of the procedure depends on the unproven assumption of the independence of emission events. Other possible sources of bias include enhancement, imperfect synchronisation, over-reliance on rotational invariance, and the well-known detection loophole. Investigation of existing results may be more fruitful than attempts at loophole-free Bell tests, improving our understanding of light.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Timing, ``Accidentals'' and Other Artifacts in EPR Experiments does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Timing, ``Accidentals'' and Other Artifacts in EPR Experiments, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Timing, ``Accidentals'' and Other Artifacts in EPR Experiments will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-273135

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.