Parameter Independence and Outcome Independence in Dynamical Collapse Theories

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

Ghirardi, Grassi, Butterfield, and Fleming have previously argued that two distinct formulations of dynamical reduction (GRW) theories have distinct non-local properties: one (the "non-linear" formulation) violates Parameter Independence while the other (the "linear + cooking" formulation) violates Outcome Independence. The claim is then that, since theories violating Outcome Independence are compatible with relativity in a way that theories violating Parameter Independence are not, the "linear + cooking" dynamical reduction theories hold the key to reconciling quantum non-locality with relativity. I review and assess this claim, arguing that, while ultimately misleading, there is an interesting and important lesson to be extracted.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Parameter Independence and Outcome Independence in Dynamical Collapse Theories does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Parameter Independence and Outcome Independence in Dynamical Collapse Theories, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Parameter Independence and Outcome Independence in Dynamical Collapse Theories will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-269343

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.