Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Scientific paper
2006-09-11
JHEP0611:052,2006
Physics
High Energy Physics
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
21 pages, 16 figures, accepted by JHEP
Scientific paper
10.1088/1126-6708/2006/11/052
We compare the abilities of the cluster-type jet algorithm, KtJet, and a mid-point iterating cone algorithm to reconstruct the top mass at the LHC. We discuss the information contained in the merging scales of cluster-type algorithms, and how this can be used in experimental analyses, as well as the different sources of systematic errors for the two algorithms. We find that the sources of systematic error are different for the two algorithms, which may help to better constrain the systematic error on the top mass at the LHC.
Seymour Michael H.
Tevlin Christopher
No associations
LandOfFree
A Comparison of two different jet algorithms for the top mass reconstruction at the LHC does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A Comparison of two different jet algorithms for the top mass reconstruction at the LHC, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A Comparison of two different jet algorithms for the top mass reconstruction at the LHC will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-25547