A Comparison of two different jet algorithms for the top mass reconstruction at the LHC

Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

21 pages, 16 figures, accepted by JHEP

Scientific paper

10.1088/1126-6708/2006/11/052

We compare the abilities of the cluster-type jet algorithm, KtJet, and a mid-point iterating cone algorithm to reconstruct the top mass at the LHC. We discuss the information contained in the merging scales of cluster-type algorithms, and how this can be used in experimental analyses, as well as the different sources of systematic errors for the two algorithms. We find that the sources of systematic error are different for the two algorithms, which may help to better constrain the systematic error on the top mass at the LHC.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A Comparison of two different jet algorithms for the top mass reconstruction at the LHC does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A Comparison of two different jet algorithms for the top mass reconstruction at the LHC, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A Comparison of two different jet algorithms for the top mass reconstruction at the LHC will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-25547

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.