Response to Feng Hao's paper "Kish's key exchange scheme is insecure"

Physics – General Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Accepted for publication in Fluctuation and Noise Letters (for the December 2006 issue)

Scientific paper

In a forthcoming paper in IEE Proceedings Information Security, Feng Hao claims that temperature inaccuracies make the key exchange scheme based on Kirchhoff Loop with Johnson-like Noise insecure. First we point out that this claim is irrelevant for the security of the idealized/mathematical communicator because it violates basic assumptions. Furthermore, in general practical applications, as it has been pointed out in the very first paper, the use of thermal noise is disadvantageous therefore the issue of temperature and its accuracy is unimportant even for the security of common practical realizations. It is important to emphasize that any deviation from the idealized scheme can lead to a finite level of security. Thus, if the above-mentioned author had stressed the inaccuracy of the resistor values; his claim would have been practically valid. However the impact of such systematic errors can be kept under control. Here we cite our relevant analysis (Phys. Lett. A 359, (2006) 741-744) of 1% voltage inaccuracy along the line due to wire resistance effects, which can be considered as a general result for inaccuracies of this order. The necessity to build a statistics to extract information during the properly chosen clock time leads to extremely poor eavesdropper statistics and this situation provides a good practical raw bit security that can be orders of magnitude beyond the raw bit security of idealized quantum communicators.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Response to Feng Hao's paper "Kish's key exchange scheme is insecure" does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Response to Feng Hao's paper "Kish's key exchange scheme is insecure", we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Response to Feng Hao's paper "Kish's key exchange scheme is insecure" will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-242346

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.