Physics
Scientific paper
Apr 1951
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1951amjph..19..197h&link_type=abstract
American Journal of Physics, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp. 197-202 (1951).
Physics
Scientific paper
The view is first developed that it was in the effort of Copernicus' successors to justify fundamentally the validity of the change of conception usually associated with his name that the science of dynamics took a systematic shape. Then Newton's argument is examined that the ptolemaic alternative must mean a disruption of the solar system which is not witnessed and, therefore, the Copernicus-Kepler scheme ought to be accepted absolutely. This particular reasoning of Newton is shown, however, to suffer from a defect. The basis of others of Newton's arguments on the subject is considered, and it is presented that the application of dynamical principles makes the copernican standpoint on planetary motions no more final than the high degree of probability adduced in its favor by Copernicus himself on the ground of its merit of simplicity and harmony as compared with Ptolemy's picture.
No associations
LandOfFree
About an Argument of Newton does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with About an Argument of Newton, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and About an Argument of Newton will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1859489