Giant planet population synthesis: comparing theory with observations

Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

9

Scientific paper

The characteristics of the now over 250 known extra-solar giant planets begin to provide a database with which current planet formation theories can be put to the test. To do this, we synthesize the expected planet population based on the core-accretion scenario by sampling initial conditions in a Monte Carlo fashion. We then apply appropriate observational detection biases and compare the resulting population with the one actually detected. Quantitative statistical tests allow us to determine how well the models are reproducing the observed samples. The model can be applied to compute the expected planet population detectable with different techniques (radial velocity measurements, transits, gravitational lensing, etc) or orbiting stars of different masses. In the latter case, we show that forming Jupiter-mass planets orbiting M dwarfs within the lifetime of proto-planetary disks is indeed possible. However, the models predict that with decreasing stellar mass, the ratio of Jupiter- to Neptune-mass planets will sharply decrease.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Giant planet population synthesis: comparing theory with observations does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Giant planet population synthesis: comparing theory with observations, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Giant planet population synthesis: comparing theory with observations will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1807586

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.