Physics
Scientific paper
Dec 2009
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2009agufmgp13a0772z&link_type=abstract
American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2009, abstract #GP13A-0772
Physics
[2706] Magnetospheric Physics / Cusp, [2721] Magnetospheric Physics / Field-Aligned Currents And Current Systems, [2740] Magnetospheric Physics / Magnetospheric Configuration And Dynamics
Scientific paper
Eight years of magnetic field data, taken while the four Cluster spacecraft pass through, or adjacent to, the equatorial ring current, have been surveyed to investigate the effects on the Earth’s magnetic field components of the externally driven current systems connecting the ionospheric, cusp and ring current regions. We compare the modeled magnetic field, expected at Cluster, and the measured behavior using different global field models (Tsyganenko 1989, 1996, and 2001), and data from the four Cluster spacecraft, to better identify the result of the changing magnetospheric location (also due to the progressive southward dropping of the Cluster orbit and changing magnetospheric response). Residual field values, obtained by differencing the data and model field components, are used. The study shows that these residuals can reach ~20 nT near perigee and take two forms: well-defined smooth trends over the region of the ring current and frequently sampled, sharp, bipolar signatures, associated either with region 2 field aligned currents (FACs) connecting to the ionospheric current system (nightside), or with low-altitude cusp FACs (dayside). These deviations from the expected model field show that there are ring current and FAC components which are not fully modeled. The sharp bipolar signatures are not always sampled, implying a localized extent. The 4-spacecraft sample different signatures at the large separations achieved during the later years. Using the four-spacecraft technique, we infer that the region 2 FACs, with a size of ~0.17-0.54 RE, and cusp FACs, with a size of ~0.06-0.12 RE, are very stable and are almost stationary.
Dunlop Malcolm
Holme Richard
Woodfield E. E.
Zhang Qian
No associations
LandOfFree
COMPARISONS OF EIGHT YEARS MAGNETIC FIELD DATA FROM CLUSTER WITH TSYGANENKO MODELS does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with COMPARISONS OF EIGHT YEARS MAGNETIC FIELD DATA FROM CLUSTER WITH TSYGANENKO MODELS, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and COMPARISONS OF EIGHT YEARS MAGNETIC FIELD DATA FROM CLUSTER WITH TSYGANENKO MODELS will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1776830