Physics
Scientific paper
Apr 1992
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1992jatp...54..463k&link_type=abstract
Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics (ISSN 0021-9169), vol. 54, Mar.-Apr. 1992, p. 463-466.
Physics
14
Extreme Ultraviolet Radiation, Ionospheric Electron Density, Solar Flux Density, Solar Terrestrial Interactions, Sunspots, E Region, Electromagnetic Noise, F Region, Thermosphere
Scientific paper
Plots of monthly median noon time foF2 values at Manila, Kodaikanal, and Vanimo vs. solar EUV flux (170-190 A), smoothed sunspot number R12, and smoothed solar radio noise (10.7 cm) flux indicate saturation effects in the foF2 vs. sunspot plots. The saturation diminishes in the foF2 vs. solar radio noise plots and disappears for foF2 vs. solar EUV plots. Thus, in the absence of EUV data, solar radio noise could be a reasonably good substitute, better than sunspots, for predicting foF2 values on time scales of one month or more.
No associations
LandOfFree
Sunspots, solar radio noise, solar EUV and ionospheric foF2 does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Sunspots, solar radio noise, solar EUV and ionospheric foF2, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Sunspots, solar radio noise, solar EUV and ionospheric foF2 will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1737293