Physics – Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
2000-01-16
Physics
Quantum Physics
6 pages
Scientific paper
Byrne and Hall (1999) criticized the argument of Chalmers (1996) in favor of the Everett-style interpretation. They claimed to show ``the deep and underappreciated flaw in ANY Everett-style interpretation''. I will argue that it is possible to interpret Chalmers's writing in such a way that most of the criticism by Byrne and Hall does not apply. In any case their general criticism of the many-worlds interpretation is unfounded. The recent recognition that the Everett-style interpretations are good (if not the best) interpretations of quantum mechanics has, therefore, not been negated.
No associations
LandOfFree
Discussion: Byrne and Hall on Everett and Chalmers does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Discussion: Byrne and Hall on Everett and Chalmers, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Discussion: Byrne and Hall on Everett and Chalmers will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-17198