Discussion: Byrne and Hall on Everett and Chalmers

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

6 pages

Scientific paper

Byrne and Hall (1999) criticized the argument of Chalmers (1996) in favor of the Everett-style interpretation. They claimed to show ``the deep and underappreciated flaw in ANY Everett-style interpretation''. I will argue that it is possible to interpret Chalmers's writing in such a way that most of the criticism by Byrne and Hall does not apply. In any case their general criticism of the many-worlds interpretation is unfounded. The recent recognition that the Everett-style interpretations are good (if not the best) interpretations of quantum mechanics has, therefore, not been negated.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Discussion: Byrne and Hall on Everett and Chalmers does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Discussion: Byrne and Hall on Everett and Chalmers, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Discussion: Byrne and Hall on Everett and Chalmers will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-17198

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.