Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Scientific paper
1997-04-29
Nucl.Phys. B513 (1998) 661-678
Physics
High Energy Physics
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
22 pages Latex, 3 figures included
Scientific paper
10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00707-4
We consider the question of whether cosmic ray catalysed false vacuum decay can be phenomenologically more important than spontaneous decay via quantum tunnelling. We extend the zero bubble wall width Landau-WKB analysis of catalysed false vacuum decay to include the leading order effects of finite wall width and derive an expression for the thin-wall bubble action. Using this we calculate the exponential suppression factor for the catalysed decay rate at the critical bubble energy, corresponding to the largest probability of catalysed decay. We show that, in general, cosmic ray catalysed decay is likely to be more important than spontaneous decay for sufficiently thin-walled bubbles (wall thickness less than about 30 % of the initial bubble radius), but that spontaneous decay will dominate for the case of thick-walled bubbles. Since any perturbative model with a cosmologically significant false vacuum decay rate will almost certainly produce thick-walled bubbles, we can conclude that cosmic ray catalysed false vacuum decay will never dominate over tunnelling in imposing phenomenological constraints on perturbative particle physics models.
Enqvist Kari
McDonald Janece
No associations
LandOfFree
Can Cosmic Ray Catalysed Vacuum Decay Dominate Over Tunnelling? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Can Cosmic Ray Catalysed Vacuum Decay Dominate Over Tunnelling?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Can Cosmic Ray Catalysed Vacuum Decay Dominate Over Tunnelling? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-171565