Lunar Dust and the Gegenschein

Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

1

Scientific paper

OF the four possible explanations of the gegenschein which have been proposed, not one so far has explained satisfactorily the meagre observational data concerning this phenomenon. The Glyden-Moulton hypothesis1, which suggests a concentration of meteoric material at a libration point of the Sun-Earth system, seems incapable of explaining all the luminosity of the gegenschein. The zodiacal light hypothesis2, which claims that the glow opposite the Sun results from a phase-function for the interplanetary dust layer which produces such a brightening, fails to explain the fact that the gegenschein usually lies approximately 3° west of the anti-solar point3. The gaseous tail hypothesis4,5, in explaining the light as the result of excitation of Earth-escaped gases by the interplanetary plasma, does not account for the fact that the colour of the gegenschein is slightly redder than that of the Sun6. Finally, the dust tail hypothesis7, although explaining the facts in a qualitative way, at least, requires a large and continuous source of dust particles in Earth's neighbourhood.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Lunar Dust and the Gegenschein does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Lunar Dust and the Gegenschein, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Lunar Dust and the Gegenschein will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1709115

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.