Physics
Scientific paper
Oct 2005
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2005georl..3219304b&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 32, Issue 19, CiteID L19304
Physics
10
Tectonophysics: Dynamics Of Lithosphere And Mantle: General (1213), Tectonophysics: Plate Boundary: General (3040), Tectonophysics: Rheology: Mantle (8033), Tectonophysics: Subduction Zone Processes (1031, 3060, 3613, 8413)
Scientific paper
The effect of rheology on the evolution of the slab-tip during subduction initiation is analyzed using 2-D numerical flow models. Experimentally determined flow laws have both strong temperature- and stress-dependence, which leads to large local variations in viscosity with direct consequences for subduction initiation. We find that models with Newtonian viscosity lead to flat or coupled subduction due to hydrodynamic stresses that pull the slab-tip up towards the overriding plate. Non-Newtonian rheology reduces these hydrodynamic stresses by decreasing the wedge viscosity and the slab coupling to wedge-corner flow, rendering the small negative-slab buoyancy of the slab-tip sufficient to maintain its dip during the early stages of subduction.
Billen Magali I.
Hirth Greg
No associations
LandOfFree
Newtonian versus non-Newtonian upper mantle viscosity: Implications for subduction initiation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Newtonian versus non-Newtonian upper mantle viscosity: Implications for subduction initiation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Newtonian versus non-Newtonian upper mantle viscosity: Implications for subduction initiation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1625750