Measures and Mismeasures of Scientific Quality

Physics – Physics and Society

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

5 pages, 1 figure; typos corrected; supporting online material available at www.imm.dtu.dk/~slj/0512238.suppl.pdf

Scientific paper

We present a general Bayesian method for quantifying the statistical reliability of one-dimensional measures of scientific quality based on citation data. Two quality measures used in practice -- ``papers per year'' and ``Hirsch's $h$'' -- are shown to lack the accuracy and precision necessary to be useful. The mean, median and maximum number of citations are on the other hand reliable and permit accurate predictions of future author performance on the basis of as few as 50 publications.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Measures and Mismeasures of Scientific Quality does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Measures and Mismeasures of Scientific Quality, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Measures and Mismeasures of Scientific Quality will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-149825

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.