Repeater models and sky coverage

Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Gamma-Ray Sources, Gamma-Ray Bursts

Scientific paper

The BATSE data does not prove that burst sources repeat, but also does not rule out such repetitions. However, the implications of the observed constraints depend on the repetition model. I find that the repetition content is very weakly dependent on the sky coverage (fraction of the sky observed on average) for models where bursts occur at an average rate, and is primarily a function of the number of bursts in a sample. A given observed repetition fraction (fraction of events which originate from sources which are observed to burst more than once) can be produced by a small number of sources which burst frequently or from a larger number which burst less frequently.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Repeater models and sky coverage does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Repeater models and sky coverage, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Repeater models and sky coverage will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1445658

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.