Other
Scientific paper
Jul 1988
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1988georl..15..729t&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Research Letters (ISSN 0094-8276), vol. 15, July 1988, p. 729-732.
Other
14
Lightning, Noise Propagation, Radio Telemetry, Venus Surface, Volcanoes, Whistlers, Electric Fields, Pioneer Venus Spacecraft, Radio Frequency Interference, Satellite-Borne Instruments
Scientific paper
Spike-like responses to interruptions in the data recorded by the Pioneer Venus Orbiter electric field detector, identified as broadband whistler noise by Singh and Russell (1986), are analyzed. It is shown that these spikes are nonphysical artifacts of the processing of interruptions in telemetry data, and that they are readily distinguishable from other nonartificial noise apppearing in the measurements. It is suggested that key portions of the results of Singh and Russell are compromised by the inclusion of the artificial data. It is concluded that the present electric field data set provides no evidence for inferring the presence of either lighning or present-day volcanism at Venus.
Cloutier Paul A.
Taylor Harry A. Jr.
No associations
LandOfFree
Telemetry interference incorrectly interpreted as evidence for lightning and present-day volcanism at Venus does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Telemetry interference incorrectly interpreted as evidence for lightning and present-day volcanism at Venus, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Telemetry interference incorrectly interpreted as evidence for lightning and present-day volcanism at Venus will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1423136