Physics
Scientific paper
Dec 2010
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2010p%26ss...58.1792k&link_type=abstract
Planetary and Space Science, Volume 58, Issue 14-15, p. 1792-1801.
Physics
1
Scientific paper
In the plots of -Dst(min) versus -Bz(min) in cycle 23, in restricted ranges of -Dst(min), there was lot of scatter and the correlations were low. A bivariate analysis using geomagnetic -Dst(min) and auroral AE index did not improve the situation. Substitution of -Dst(min) by the ram-pressure-corrected true ring current Dst*(min) improved the correlations only slightly. Using the product V Bz instead of Bz(min) as a proxy for magnetospheric energy input did not improve the correlations, even for the 12 severe storm events in cycle 23. A multivariate analysis using -Bz(min) versus -Dst(min), with AU, AL and auroral particle precipitation index POES as additional indices improved the correlations and reduced the scatter. It was noticed, however, that for these severe storms, a major part of the solar wind input energy (˜85%) was still going to the Dst ring current, but this had an uncertainty of ˜15%. So in any severe storm event, the ring current could receive anything from 70% to 100% of the solar wind input energy.
No associations
LandOfFree
Scatter in the plots of Dst(min) versus Bz(min) does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Scatter in the plots of Dst(min) versus Bz(min), we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Scatter in the plots of Dst(min) versus Bz(min) will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1310009