Physics
Scientific paper
Jan 1999
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1999angeo..17...11j&link_type=abstract
Annales Geophysicae, vol. 17, Issue 1, pp.11-26
Physics
8
Scientific paper
The kinetic theory of precipitating electrons with Maxwellian source plasma yields the well-known current-voltage relationship (CV-relationship; Knight formula), which can in most cases be accurately approximated by a reduced linear formula. Our question is whether it is possible to obtain this CV-relationship from fluid theory, and if so, to what extent it is physically equivalent with the more accurate kinetic counterpart. An answer to this question is necessary before trying to understand how one could combine time-dependent and transient phenomena such as Alfvénic waves with a slowly evolving background described by the CV-relationship. We first compute the fluid quantity profiles (density, pressure etc.) along a flux tube based on kinetic theory solution. A parallel potential drop accumulates plasma (and pressure) below it, which explains why the current is linearly proportional to the potential drop in the kinetic theory even though the velocity of the accelerated particles is only proportional to the square root of the accelerating voltage. Electron fluid theory reveals that the kinetic theory results can be reproduced, except for different numerical constants, if and only if the polytropic index
No associations
LandOfFree
On the current-voltage relationship in fluid theory does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with On the current-voltage relationship in fluid theory, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On the current-voltage relationship in fluid theory will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1189606