Physics
Scientific paper
Dec 1992
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1992daec.conf...51m&link_type=abstract
In Distribution of Matter in the Universe, 2nd DAEC mtg, ed. G.A. Mamon and D. Gerbal (Meudon: Obs. de Paris) p. 51-66
Physics
12
Scientific paper
I review here the debate on the nature of compact groups of galaxies: are the compact groups catalogued by Hickson physically dense systems or are they caused by chance alignments within larger systems? Results of recent N-body simulations of loose groups are analyzed, showing that only 10% of compact configurations seen in projection are three dimensional dense systems (of which roughly half are bound), whereas the remaining 90% are one dimensional chance alignments. Moreover, these chance alignments turn out to be binary-rich (with a small fraction of triplets too). The arguments reviewed here and these last two results suggest that rather than being dense quartets and quintets, most compact groups are binary-rich chance alignments within larger systems, thus providing a natural explanation to the high level of physical interactions seen in compact groups. Moreover, it is suggested that the most distant compact groups may represent the bright-ends of rich evolved clusters.
No associations
LandOfFree
Compact group modeling does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Compact group modeling, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Compact group modeling will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1114104