Physics
Scientific paper
Mar 2001
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2001phrvd..63f8501s&link_type=abstract
Physical Review D, vol. 63, Issue 6, id. 068501
Physics
8
Canonical Formalism, Lagrangians, And Variational Principles, Canonical Quantization
Scientific paper
We make two observations about Holst's derivation of Barbero's Hamiltonian formulation from a covariant Lagrangian. While Holst's derivation does appear to be correct, there are two points in the derivation which may be worth clarifying. These concern the choice of time gauge and the manner in which the Hamiltonian variables are defined in terms of the covariant ones. We emphasize that our observations in no way affect the validity of Holst's result.
No associations
LandOfFree
Comment on Holst's Lagrangian formulation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comment on Holst's Lagrangian formulation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on Holst's Lagrangian formulation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1093931