Physics – Nuclear Physics – Nuclear Theory
Scientific paper
2003-04-17
Phys.Rev. C69 (2004) 069801
Physics
Nuclear Physics
Nuclear Theory
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevC.69.069801
In a recent paper L.G. Moretto et al [nucl-th/0208024] claim that the negative heat capacities presented in our previously published paper \cite{PRL2000} are "artifacts" coming from the use of periodic boundary conditions in the Lattice-Gas calculations. We stress in this comment that this claim is wrong: in ref. \cite{PRL2000} we did not use periodic boundary conditions and anyhow the boundary conditions are irrelevant for the statistical ensemble used in \cite{PRL2000}. The second claim of [nucl-th/0208024] is that, because of the Coulomb repulsion, systems "with A>60 should present no anomalous negative heat capacities". We show that this conclusion is contradicted by exact Lattice-gas simulations including Coulomb forces which present negative heat capacities even for A>200.
Chomaz Ph.
Gulminelli Francesca
No associations
LandOfFree
Comment on "Negative heat capacities and first order phase transitions in nuclei" by L.G. Moretto et al does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comment on "Negative heat capacities and first order phase transitions in nuclei" by L.G. Moretto et al, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on "Negative heat capacities and first order phase transitions in nuclei" by L.G. Moretto et al will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-10607