Physics
Scientific paper
Feb 1992
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1992jgr....97.1345a&link_type=abstract
Journal of Geophysical Research (ISSN 0148-0227), vol. 97, Feb. 1, 1992, p. 1345-1352. Research supported by Korea Science and E
Physics
32
Auroral Electrojets, Earth Magnetosphere, Polar Caps, Solar Wind, Electric Potential, Ionospheric Conductivity, Solar Terrestrial Interactions
Scientific paper
Results are presented of an estimate of the cross-polar cap potential difference Phi (KRM) from ground magnetic perturbation data through the magnetometer inversion method of Kamide et al. (1981), combined with an 'empirical' ionospheric conductance distribution estimated from the DMSP X-ray image data. A significant correlation is found between Phi (KRM) and the AE(12) index. Phi (KRM) is then compared with the potential difference estimated from a more direct method of the satellite electric field measurements and also with Phi (IMF) based on solar wind parameters. Phi (IMF) is found to be linearly correlated with Phi (KRM), as Phi (IMF) = 29.8 + 0.999 Phi (KRM), with the highest correlation obtained for a 40-min lag in the IMF. The hypothesis that directly driven processes are more important than unloading processes during disturbed periods is confirmed.
Ahn Byung-Ho.
Gorney David J.
Kamide Yohsuke
Kroehl Herbert W.
No associations
LandOfFree
Cross-polar cap potential difference, auroral electrojet indices, and solar wind parameters does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Cross-polar cap potential difference, auroral electrojet indices, and solar wind parameters, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Cross-polar cap potential difference, auroral electrojet indices, and solar wind parameters will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1049137