Physics
Scientific paper
Dec 2000
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2000georl..27.3925l&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 27, Issue 23, p. 3925-3928
Physics
22
Geodesy And Gravity, Geodesy And Gravity: Rheology Of The Lithosphere And Mantle, Geodesy And Gravity: Space Geodetic Surveys, Geodesy And Gravity: Instruments And Techniques
Scientific paper
We compare vertical rates of deformation derived from continuous Global Positioning System (GPS) observations and episodic measurements of absolute gravity. We concentrate on 4 sites in a region of North America experiencing postglacial rebound. The rates of uplift from gravity and GPS agree within one standard deviation for all sites. The GPS vertical deformation rates are significantly more precise than the gravity rates, primarily because of the denser temporal spacing provided by continuous GPS tracking. We conclude that continuous GPS observations are more cost efficient and provide more precise estimates of vertical deformation rates than campaign style gravity observations where systematic errors are difficult to quantify.
Larson Kristine M.
van Dam Tonie
No associations
LandOfFree
Measuring postglacial rebound with GPS and absolute gravity does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Measuring postglacial rebound with GPS and absolute gravity, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Measuring postglacial rebound with GPS and absolute gravity will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1043488