Physics
Scientific paper
Aug 2011
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2011cqgra..28o0301s&link_type=abstract
Classical and Quantum Gravity, Volume 28, Issue 15, pp. 150301 (2011).
Physics
Scientific paper
The problem of quantum gravity has been with us for over 80 years. After quantum theory was established in the 1920s, it was successfully applied to the electromagnetic field. Over the years there have been many attempts to bring gravity into the fold. There has been work on the Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity, perturbative approaches to quantum gravity and more. Much intellectual effort went into understanding conceptual and technical problems stemming from the general covariance of the theory. However, in earlier decades, the subject of quantum gravity was relatively on the fringes of theoretical physics research, pursued by a small and diverse community of people.
In the mid 1980s the situation changed dramatically. The subject of quantum gravity came to the forefront of fundamental physics research, no longer a backwater but the mainstream. Quantum gravity was widely acknowledged as the last frontier of fundamental physics and attracted the brightest young people. Unlike in previous decades, workers in this area were no longer isolated groups or individuals ploughing lonely furrows, but organised into coherent `programmes' for a concerted attack on the problem. The main programmes coincidentally were all formulated in the mid 1980s. The two `programmes' covered in this section are string theory and loop quantum gravity. String theory was born an offshoot of Hadronic models in particle physics and reflects the particle physicists view that gravity is just one more interaction to be encompassed by a unified theory. Loop quantum gravity reflects the general relativist's conviction that gravity is different and should not be treated as a perturbation about Minkowski spacetime. Each of these approaches has its proponents, adherents and critics. It is now about a quarter of a century since these programmes started. It is perhaps a good time to take stock and assess where we are now and where each of these programmes is headed.
The idea in this focus section is to get a comparative perspective on these programmes, by asking our reviewers to critically evaluate progress in their programmes over the last 25 years (1986-2011). This section features invited review articles from physicists who have been associated with these programmes from their inception. They were invited to write a retrospective review: what were the initial hopes? To what extent have these hopes been realised? What were the major successes, surprises, and disappointments? The emphasis is on what has come out of the programme rather than technical developments internal to the programme. We hope that the reader, whatever his/her persuasion, will be able to form a panoramic view of quantum gravity research today within these two programmes. We hope to complement this view with a topical review of causal sets in the future.
No associations
LandOfFree
EDITORIAL: Focus section on quantum gravity - 25 years of quantum gravity Focus section on quantum gravity - 25 years of quantum gravity does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with EDITORIAL: Focus section on quantum gravity - 25 years of quantum gravity Focus section on quantum gravity - 25 years of quantum gravity, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and EDITORIAL: Focus section on quantum gravity - 25 years of quantum gravity Focus section on quantum gravity - 25 years of quantum gravity will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1023873