Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Mar 1982
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1982nciml..33..317d&link_type=abstract
Nuovo Cimento, Lettere, Serie 2, vol. 33, Mar. 13, 1982, p. 317, 318.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
Black Holes (Astronomy), Geodesy, Particle Motion, Schwarzschild Metric, Approximation, Particle Energy, Vacuum
Scientific paper
Tangherlini (1981) has claimed that the test particle approximation does not remain valid as the particle approaches the Schwarzschild event horizon. The present paper argues that Tangherlini's claim is not valid. The claim is argued to stem from the erroneous comparison of E as observed by a local observer with M which is not measured by the same observer, but by an observer at infinity. It is concluded that so far as the Schwarzschild metric is concerned, a test particle will remain a test particle for all observers at r greater than 2M.
Dadhich Naresh
Padmanabhan Thanu
No associations
LandOfFree
On the validity of the geodesic motion near a black hole - A clarification does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with On the validity of the geodesic motion near a black hole - A clarification, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On the validity of the geodesic motion near a black hole - A clarification will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1019798