Physics
Scientific paper
Feb 1994
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1994georl..21..289i&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 21, no. 4, p. 289-292
Physics
27
Backscattering, Computerized Simulation, Degradation, Ejecta, Erosion, Meteorite Craters, Monte Carlo Method, Planetary Craters, Radar Imagery, Tectonics, Venus (Planet), Venus Surface, Volcanoes, Weathering, Fracturing, Graphs (Charts), Radar Signatures, Rates (Per Time), Remote Sensing, Steady State, Tables (Data), Venus, Impact Craters, Plains, Backscatter, Morphology, Comparison, Ejecta, Volcanism, Crater Floor, Fractures, Eolian Effects, Deposits, Weathering, Tectonism, Monte Carlo Method, Simulation,
Scientific paper
In venusian plains, impact craters without extensive low backscatter ejecta deposits are more likely to have low backscatter floors, be embayed by volcanic deposits, and exhibit fractures as compared to craters with extensive low backscatter ejecta. We interpret these trends as evidence of ongoing degradation of low backscatter ejecta by aeolian activity, weathering, and volcanism. Using a crater age sequence based on extent of preservation of low backscatter ejecta, together with Monte Carlo simulations, we find that tectonic activity has extended over a longer time period than volcanism.
Arvidson Ray E.
Izenberg Noam R.
Phillips James R.
No associations
LandOfFree
Impact crater degradation on venusian plains does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Impact crater degradation on venusian plains, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Impact crater degradation on venusian plains will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1016238