Mathematics – Probability
Scientific paper
Jun 2004
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2004ep%26s...56..563i&link_type=abstract
Earth, Planets and Space, Volume 56, p. 563-571.
Mathematics
Probability
2
Scientific paper
We usually use the Brownian distribution, lognormal distribution, Gamma distribution, Weibull distribution, and exponential distribution to calculate long-term probability for the distribution of time intervals between successive events. The values of two parameters of these distributions are determined by the maximum likelihood method. The difference in log likelihood between the proposed model and the stationary Poisson process model, which scores both the period of no events and instances of each event, is considered as the index for evaluating the effectiveness of the earthquake probability model. First, we show that the expected value of the log-likelihood difference becomes the expected value of the logarithm of the probability gain. Next, by converting the time unit into the expected value of the interval, the hazard is made to represent a probability gain. This conversion reduces the degrees of freedom of model parameters to 1. We then demonstrate that the expected value of the probability gain in observed parameter values ranges between 2 and 5. Therefore, we can conclude that the long-term probability calculated before an earthquake may become several times larger than that of the Poisson process model.
No associations
LandOfFree
Probability gains expected for renewal process models does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Probability gains expected for renewal process models, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Probability gains expected for renewal process models will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-892164