Differential number counts of radio galaxies and quasars: evidence against the unified scheme

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

10

Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Nuclei, Quasars: General, Radio Continuum: Galaxies

Scientific paper

It is shown that at metre wavelengths the fraction of quasars contained in a sample appears to fall rapidly with a decrease in the flux-density level of the sample. This cannot be explained within the simple orientation-based unified scheme with a fixed average value of the half- opening angle (ψ_c_~45^deg^) for the obscuring torus. The absence of a corresponding drop in the ratio of the observed angular sizes of quasars and galaxies with the decreasing flux-density level of the sample makes it particularly difficult to explain within the unified scheme even if we allow for a systematic variation in the value of ψ_c_ with redshift or luminosity. Some implications of these observational results for the recently proposed modified versions of the unified scheme model are discussed.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Differential number counts of radio galaxies and quasars: evidence against the unified scheme does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Differential number counts of radio galaxies and quasars: evidence against the unified scheme, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Differential number counts of radio galaxies and quasars: evidence against the unified scheme will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-854906

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.