Computer Science
Scientific paper
Oct 2004
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2004esasp.557e..10m&link_type=abstract
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Green Propellants for Space Propulsion (ESA SP-557). 7-8 June 2004, Chia Lagu
Computer Science
Scientific paper
Using classical methods of assay analysis for highly concentrated rocket grade hydrogen peroxide (RGHP, H2O2), comparison and correlation to historical values using currently available commercial-source RGHP is presented. In particular, fluid densities, refractive index, and the potassium permanganate (KMnO4) wet chemical method of analysis are compared. Discussion includes those analytical processes that support field use, with attendant rapid, accurate, and verifiable concentration determinations of RGHP. Method accuracy is ranked as Manual KMnO4 Titration > Refractive Index > Density, based on vendor certifications, with the refractive index method having best precision (+/-0.02%wt H2O2). Results from densitometry data are anomalous, with variability likely due to less mature measurement techniques used in this study.
No associations
LandOfFree
Comparison of Densitometry, Refractive Index, and Classical Permanganate Titration Assay Methods with Commercially Available Rocket-Grade Hydrogen Peroxide does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comparison of Densitometry, Refractive Index, and Classical Permanganate Titration Assay Methods with Commercially Available Rocket-Grade Hydrogen Peroxide, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison of Densitometry, Refractive Index, and Classical Permanganate Titration Assay Methods with Commercially Available Rocket-Grade Hydrogen Peroxide will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-841149