Further evidence for a merger in Abell 2218 from an XMM-Newton observation

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

9 pages, 7 figures; to appear in A&A

Scientific paper

10.1051/0004-6361:20041415

(Abridged) The galaxy cluster Abell 2218, at z=0.171, is well-known for the discrepancy between mass estimates derived from X-ray and strong lensing analyses. With the present XMM observation, we trace the gas density and temperature profiles out to a radius of ~ 1400 h_70^-1 kpc (approximately the virial radius of the cluster). The surface brightness profile is well fitted over three orders of magnitude with a beta model, with a core radius of 0.'95 and \beta=0.63. The projected temperature profile declines steeply with radius (by ~50%), and is well described by a polytrope with parameters t_0=8.09 keV and \gamma=1.15. The temperature map shows a pronounced peak in the central arcminute, with an increase of a factor of two (from ~5 to ~10 keV). The mass profile, calculated assuming hydrostatic equilibrium and spherical symmetry, is best fitted with a King approximation to an isothermal sphere, implying a dark matter distribution with a central core, in contrast with the cusped cores found in more obviously relaxed clusters. The X-ray mass is two times less than the strong lensing mass at r ~ 80 h_50^-1 kpc, although the agreement between X-ray and weak lensing mass measurements at larger radius (r ~ 400 h_50^-1 kpc) is slightly better. While the X-ray total mass estimates can vary by 30% depending on the mass model, all measurements are lower than the corresponding total mass from optical measurements. Given the X-ray results indicating disturbance of the intracluster gas, leading to a likely violation of the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium, and the observed substructure in the optical, suggesting a line-of-sight merger, it is unlikely that the different mass estimates of this cluster can be reconciled, at least with standard modelling assumptions.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Further evidence for a merger in Abell 2218 from an XMM-Newton observation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Further evidence for a merger in Abell 2218 from an XMM-Newton observation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Further evidence for a merger in Abell 2218 from an XMM-Newton observation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-83435

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.