Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
Aug 2009
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2009aspc..404..209a&link_type=abstract
The Eighth Pacific Rim Conference on Stellar Astrophysics: A Tribute to Kam-Ching Leung ASP Conference Series, Vol. 404, proceed
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
Scientific paper
I explored the reason why many authors differed as to whether the field metal-poor stars are deficient in spectroscopic binaries or have the same frequency as metal-rich stars. From published studies of five large samples of binaries, it is obvious that the distribution of orbital periods of metal-poor stars peaks at 875 days while that of metal-rich stars peaks at about 22 days. That means that if one uses high-dispersion spectra, one will find many binaries in both samples but if one uses low-dispersion spectra, one will fail to detect the long-period binaries and will find more binaries among the metal-rich stars. The reason for the difference in period distributions seems to be that most of the metal-poor stars have left the globular clusters quickly (within 10^6 yr), before most of them can form short-period binaries in three-body encounters.
No associations
LandOfFree
The Difference between Metal-poor and Metal-rich Binaries does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The Difference between Metal-poor and Metal-rich Binaries, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Difference between Metal-poor and Metal-rich Binaries will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-818596