The Difference between Metal-poor and Metal-rich Binaries

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

I explored the reason why many authors differed as to whether the field metal-poor stars are deficient in spectroscopic binaries or have the same frequency as metal-rich stars. From published studies of five large samples of binaries, it is obvious that the distribution of orbital periods of metal-poor stars peaks at 875 days while that of metal-rich stars peaks at about 22 days. That means that if one uses high-dispersion spectra, one will find many binaries in both samples but if one uses low-dispersion spectra, one will fail to detect the long-period binaries and will find more binaries among the metal-rich stars. The reason for the difference in period distributions seems to be that most of the metal-poor stars have left the globular clusters quickly (within 10^6 yr), before most of them can form short-period binaries in three-body encounters.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

The Difference between Metal-poor and Metal-rich Binaries does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The Difference between Metal-poor and Metal-rich Binaries, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Difference between Metal-poor and Metal-rich Binaries will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-818596

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.