Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Dec 1996
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1996aas...189.4908h&link_type=abstract
American Astronomical Society, 189th AAS Meeting, #49.08; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 28, p.1338
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
15
Scientific paper
Standard methods of calculating false alarm probabilities (FAP) lead to an overestimate of the signifance level of features in the periodograms of classical T Tauri stars (CTTS). Correlations among data obtained over a short time period, such as a single night, exist and must be accounted for when estimating FAP's. We use a monte carlo technique which corrects for this effect to investigate its importance. We show that apparently significant rotation periods claimed for some CTTS are, in fact, not significant. This casts doubt on claims that CTTS can change period substantially from epoch to epoch.
Herbst William
Wittenmyer Rob
No associations
LandOfFree
On the Reliability of Rotation Periods Determined for Classical T Tauri Stars does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with On the Reliability of Rotation Periods Determined for Classical T Tauri Stars, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On the Reliability of Rotation Periods Determined for Classical T Tauri Stars will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-817151