Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Aug 2001
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2001mnras.325.1335k&link_type=abstract
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 325, Issue 4, pp. 1335-1340.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
Methods: Data Analysis, Methods: Statistical
Scientific paper
The observation of flux sources near the limit of detection requires a careful evaluation of possible biases in magnitude determination. Both the traditional logarithmic magnitudes and the recently proposed inverse hyperbolic sine (asinh) magnitudes are considered. Formulae are derived for three different biasing mechanisms: the statistical spread of the observed flux values arising from e.g. measurement error; the dependence of these errors on the true flux; and the dependence of the observing probability on the true flux. As an example of the results, it is noted that biases at large signal-to-noise ratios R, at which the two types of magnitude are similar, are of the order of -(p+1)/R2, where the exponent p parametrizes a power-law dependence of the probability of observation on the true flux.
No associations
LandOfFree
Bias properties of logarithmic and asinh magnitudes at very low flux levels does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Bias properties of logarithmic and asinh magnitudes at very low flux levels, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Bias properties of logarithmic and asinh magnitudes at very low flux levels will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-802367