Relating two standard notions of secrecy

Computer Science – Cryptography and Security

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

29 pages, published in LMCS

Scientific paper

10.2168/LMCS-3(3:2)2007

Two styles of definitions are usually considered to express that a security protocol preserves the confidentiality of a data s. Reachability-based secrecy means that s should never be disclosed while equivalence-based secrecy states that two executions of a protocol with distinct instances for s should be indistinguishable to an attacker. Although the second formulation ensures a higher level of security and is closer to cryptographic notions of secrecy, decidability results and automatic tools have mainly focused on the first definition so far. This paper initiates a systematic investigation of the situations where syntactic secrecy entails strong secrecy. We show that in the passive case, reachability-based secrecy actually implies equivalence-based secrecy for digital signatures, symmetric and asymmetric encryption provided that the primitives are probabilistic. For active adversaries, we provide sufficient (and rather tight) conditions on the protocol for this implication to hold.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Relating two standard notions of secrecy does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Relating two standard notions of secrecy, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Relating two standard notions of secrecy will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-726939

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.