Comparison between methods for the determination of the primary cosmic ray mass composition from the longitudinal profile of atmospheric cascades

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

22 pages, 11 figures, accepted by Astroparticle Physics, minor misprints and an extra figure removed

Scientific paper

10.1016/j.astropartphys.2005.07.

The determination of the primary cosmic ray mass composition from the longitudinal development of atmospheric cascades is still a debated issue. In this work we discuss several data analysis methods and show that if the entire information contained in the longitudinal profile is exploited, reliable results may be obtained. Among the proposed methods FCC ('Fit of the Cascade Curve'), MTA ('Multiparametric Topological Analysis') and NNA ('Neural Net Analysis') with conjugate gradient optimization algorithm give the best accuracy.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comparison between methods for the determination of the primary cosmic ray mass composition from the longitudinal profile of atmospheric cascades does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comparison between methods for the determination of the primary cosmic ray mass composition from the longitudinal profile of atmospheric cascades, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison between methods for the determination of the primary cosmic ray mass composition from the longitudinal profile of atmospheric cascades will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-706456

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.