Equivalence Principle Implications of Modified Gravity Models

Details Equivalence Principle Implications of Modified Gravity Models Equivalence Principle Implications of Modified Gravity Models

2009-05-18

arxiv.org/abs/0905.2966v2

Phys.Rev.D80:104002,2009

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astrophysics

Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics

27 pages, 4 figures, minor revisions, references added. Accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. D

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevD.80.104002

Theories that attempt to explain the observed cosmic acceleration by modifying general relativity all introduce a new scalar degree of freedom that is active on large scales, but is screened on small scales to match experiments. We show that if such screening occurrs via the chameleon mechanism such as in f(R), it is possible to have order one violation of the equivalence principle, despite the absence of explicit violation in the microscopic action. Namely, extended objects such as galaxies or constituents thereof do not all fall at the same rate. The chameleon mechanism can screen the scalar charge for large objects but not for small ones (large/small is defined by the gravitational potential and controlled by the scalar coupling). This leads to order one fluctuations in the inertial to gravitational mass ratio. In Jordan frame, it is no longer true that all objects move on geodesics. In contrast, if the scalar screening occurrs via strong coupling, such as in the DGP braneworld model, equivalence principle violation occurrs at a much reduced level. We propose several observational tests of the chameleon mechanism: 1. small galaxies should fall faster than large galaxies, even when dynamical friction is negligible; 2. voids defined by small galaxies would be larger compared to standard expectations; 3. stars and diffuse gas in small galaxies should have different velocities, even on the same orbits; 4. lensing and dynamical mass estimates should agree for large galaxies but disagree for small ones. We discuss possible pitfalls in some of these tests. The cleanest is the third one where mass estimate from HI rotational velocity could exceed that from stars by 30 % or more. To avoid blanket screening of all objects, the most promising place to look is in voids.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Equivalence Principle Implications of Modified Gravity Models does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Equivalence Principle Implications of Modified Gravity Models, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Equivalence Principle Implications of Modified Gravity Models will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-698929