Comment on the Appropriate Null Hypothesis for Cosmological Birefringence

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

3 page, LaTeX, 1 ps fig included. Submitted as a Comment to PRL. We leave our initial Comment unchanged and append two pages d

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1957

A recent paper (Nodland and Ralston, PRL 78, 3043, astro-ph/9704196) claims to have detected evidence for birefringence in the propagation of radio waves across cosmological distances. In order to assess the statistical significance of their results, the authors analyze simulated data sets, finding a stronger correlation in the real data than in the simulations. Unfortunately, the procedure used for generating the simulated data sets is based on an incorrect null hypothesis. Furthermore, the correct null hypothesis would lead to a stronger correlation in the simulated data sets, weakening the case for birefringence. We conclude that the paper's analysis does not provide statistically significant evidence of birefringence.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comment on the Appropriate Null Hypothesis for Cosmological Birefringence does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comment on the Appropriate Null Hypothesis for Cosmological Birefringence, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on the Appropriate Null Hypothesis for Cosmological Birefringence will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-679122

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.