Spectroscopic versus Photometric Metallicities: Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidal Companions as a Test Case

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

17 pages, 12 figures; A&A accepted

Scientific paper

10.1051/0004-6361/201116998

Aims. The method of deriving photometric metallicities using red giant branch stars is applied to resolved stellar populations under the common assumption that they mainly consist of single-age old stellar populations. We explore the effect of the presence of mixed-age stellar populations on deriving photometric metallicities. Methods. We use photometric data sets for the five Galactic dwarf spheroidals Sculptor, Sextans, Carina, Fornax, and Leo II in order to derive their photometric metallicity distribution functions from their resolved red giant branches using isochrones of the Dartmouth Stellar Evolutionary Database. We compare the photometric metallicities with published spectroscopic metallicities based on the analysis of the near-infrared Ca triplet (Ca T), both on the metallicity scale of Carretta & Gratton and on the scale defined by the Dartmouth isochrones. In addition, we compare the photometric metallicities with published spectroscopic metallicities based on spectral synthesis and medium-resolution spectroscopy, and on high resolution spectra where available. Results. The mean properties of the spectroscopic and photometric metallicity samples are comparable within the intrinsic scatter of each method although the mean metallicities of dSphs with pronounced intermediate-age population fractions may be underestimated by the photometric method by up to a few tenths of dex in [Fe/H]. The star-by-star differences of the spectroscopic minus the photometric metallicities show a wide range of values along the fiducial spectroscopic metallicity range, with the tendency to have systematically lower photometric metallicities for those dwarf spheroidals with a higher fraction of intermediate-age populations. Such discrepancies persist even in the case of the purely old Sculptor dSph, where one would na\"ively expect a very good match when comparing with medium or low resolution metallicity measurements. Overall, the agreement between Ca T metallicities and photometric metallicities is very good in the metallicity range from ~ -2 dex to ~ -1.5 dex. We find that the photometric method is reliable in galaxies that contain small (less than 15%) intermediate-age stellar fractions. Therefore, in the presence of mixed-age stellar populations, one needs to quantify the fraction of the intermediate-age stars in order to assess their effect on determining metallicities from photometry alone. Finally, we note that the comparison of spectroscopic metallicities of the same stars obtained with different methods reveals similarly large discrepancies as the comparison with photometric metallicities.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Spectroscopic versus Photometric Metallicities: Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidal Companions as a Test Case does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Spectroscopic versus Photometric Metallicities: Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidal Companions as a Test Case, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Spectroscopic versus Photometric Metallicities: Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidal Companions as a Test Case will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-678864

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.